Search for: All records

The uncertainty in modeling emotions makes speech emotion recognition (SER) systems less reliable. An intuitive way to increase trust in SER is to reject predictions with low confidence. This approach assumes that an SER system is well calibrated, where highly confident predictions are often right and low confident predictions are often wrong. Hence, it is desirable to calibrate the confidence of SER classifiers. We evaluate the reliability of SER systems by exploring the relationship between confidence and accuracy, using the expected calibration error (ECE) metric. We develop a multi-label variant of the post-hoc temperature scaling (TS) method to calibrate SER systems, while preserving their accuracy. The best method combines an emotion co-occurrence weight penalty function, a class-balanced objective function, and the proposed multi-label TS calibration method. The experiments show the effectiveness of our developed multi-label calibration method in terms of ac- curacy and ECE. 

In the field of affective computing, emotional annotations are highly important for both the recognition and synthesis of human emotions. Researchers must ensure that these emotional labels are adequate for modeling general human perception. An unavoidable part of obtaining such labels is that human annotators are exposed to known and unknown stimuli before and during the annotation process that can affect their perception. Emotional stimuli cause an affective priming effect, which is a pre-conscious phenomenon in which previous emotional stimuli affect the emotional perception of a current target stimulus. In this paper, we use sequences of emotional annotations during a perceptual evaluation to study the effect of affective priming on emotional ratings of speech. We observe that previous emotional sentences with extreme emotional content push annotations of current samples to the same extreme. We create a sentence-level bias metric to study the effect of affective priming on speech emotion recognition (SER) modeling. The metric is used to identify subsets in the database with more affective priming bias intentionally creating biased datasets. We train and test SER models using the full and biased datasets. Our results show that although the biased datasets have low inter-evaluator agreements, SER models for arousal and dominance trained with those datasets perform the best. For valence, the models trained with the less-biased datasets perform the best. 

This study proposes the novel formulation of measuring emotional similarity between speech recordings. This formulation explores the ordinal nature of emotions by comparing emotional similarities instead of predicting an emotional attribute, or recognizing an emotional category. The proposed task determines which of two alternative samples has the most similar emotional content to the emotion of a given anchor. This task raises some interesting questions. Which is the emotional descriptor that provide the most suitable space to assess emotional similarities? Can deep neural networks (DNNs) learn representations to robustly quantify emotional similarities? We address these questions by exploring alternative emotional spaces created with attribute-based descriptors and categorical emotions. We create the representation using a DNN trained with the triplet loss function, which relies on triplets formed with an anchor, a positive example, and a negative example. We select a positive sample that has similar emotion content to the anchor, and a negative sample that has dissimilar emotion to the anchor. The task of our DNN is to identify the positive sample. The experimental evaluations demonstrate that we can learn a meaningful embedding to assess emotional similarities, achieving higher performance than human evaluators asked to complete the same task.